Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Navigating Uncertain Terrain: Unveiling the Factors Influencing E-Governance Adoption in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Received: 25 August 2024     Accepted: 9 September 2024     Published: 26 September 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This research provides a comprehensive examination of the factors influencing e-governance adoption in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It leverages a combined framework integrating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. This approach, integrating specific variables like trust, which encompasses information security, is particularly relevant in the context of the Democratic Republic of the Congo's unique socio-political environment, where digital governance offers significant potential for improving public services and fostering transparency. The research employs a robust methodology, including a survey of 154 respondents and the use of Covariance-based Structured Equation Model analysis to identify the key factors influencing e-governance adoption. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners working on e-governance initiatives, not only in the DR Congo but also in developing countries facing similar challenges. Results show that users value e-governance systems that are easy to navigate and use. The access to accurate and relevant information is essential for effective e-governance adoption. Furthermore, facilitating conditions such as access to resources, knowledge, and compatible technology are crucial for enabling citizen engagement. Additionally, social influence, including social norms and perceived image, impacts users' attitudes and intentions towards e-governance adoption. Building trust in government is critical for encouraging citizen participation and adoption of e-governance services.

Published in American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajomis.20240903.11
Page(s) 43-55
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

E-Governance, ICT, Public Administration, DR Congo, Technology Adoption, Is in Developing Countries

References
[1] Adah, B. A. (2015). The Status and Nature of E-governance in Nigeria. Conference on e-Governance in Nigeria (CUCEN 2015).
[2] Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (2000). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of internet banking? Information Systems Research, 11(4), 346-362.
[3] Almarabeh, T., & AbuAli, A. (2010). A general framework for e-government: definition maturity challenges, opportunities, and success. European Journal of Scientific Research, 39(1), 29-42.
[4] Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16, 74-94.
[5] Baležentis, A., & Paražinskaitė, G. (2012). The benchmarking of the government to employee (G2e) technology development: Theoretical aspects of the model construction. Social Technologies, 2(1), 53-66.
[6] Becerra-Fernandez, I., Carter, L., & Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A. (1999). The role of trust in the formation of consumer intentions to use internet banking. Journal of Organizational Computing, 9(1), 1-17.
[7] Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
[8] Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological methods & research, 21(2), 230-258.
[9] Cabinet du Président de la République Démocratique du Congo. (2019). *Plan national du numérique: Horizon 2025 - Pour une RDC connectée et performante*. Kinshasa: Présidence de la République Démocratique du Congo.
[10] Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen participation: Models and methods. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(11), 1179-1196.
[11] Carmines, E. G. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. Social measurement: Current issues, 80.
[12] Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information systems journal, 15(1), 5-25.
[13] Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2022). ICT use in central government: Scope, predictors and effects on coordination quality. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), 273-286.
[14] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
[15] DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information systems research, 3(1), 60-95.
[16] DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.
[17] eEurope, B. (2005). An information society for all. An Action Plan to be presented in view of the Sevilla Europen Cancil, COM (2002), 263.
[18] Emrah Kanat, İ., & Özkan, S. (2009). Exploring citizens' perception of government to citizen services: A model based on theory of planned behaviour (TBP). Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 3(4), 406-419.
[19] Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. sage.
[20] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
[21] Guijarro, L. (2007). Interoperability frameworks and enterprise archi-tectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 89–101.
[22] Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
[23] Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40, 414-433.
[24] Heeks, R. (2001). Understanding e-governance for development.
[25] Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing egovernment: An international text. Sage.
[26] Holzer, M., & Kloby, K. (2005). Public performance measurement: An assessment of the state‐of‐the‐art and models for citizen participation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(7), 517-532.
[27] Hussein, R., Mohamed, N., Ahlan, A. R., Mahmud, M., & Aditiawarman, U. (2010). G2C adoption of e-government in Malaysia: Trust, perceived risk and political self-efficacy. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 6(3), 57-72.
[28] Hussein, R., Mohamed, N., Rahman Ahlan, A., & Mahmud, M. (2011). E‐government application: an integrated model on G2C adoption of online tax. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(3), 225-248.
[29] James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1983). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills (Calif.): Sage, 1983.
[30] Jeng, D. J. F., & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Social influence on the use of clinical decision support systems: revisiting the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology by the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(3), 819-828.
[31] Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D., & Magidson, J. (1979). Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. (No Title).
[32] Kolodner, J. A., Perry, M., & Kibler, D. (1998). Educational technology for libraries. Library Trends, 47(1), 3-30.
[33] Krejcie, R., & Morgan, S. (1970). Sample size determination. Business Research Methods, 4(5), 34-36.
[34] Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2016). Administrative reforms. Processes, trends and content. In C. Greve, P. Lægreid, & L. H. Rykkja (Eds.), Nordic administra-tive reforms. Lessons for public management (pp. 105– 128). PalgraveMacmillan.
[35] Lee, M. D., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust-based framework for web site evaluation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41(4), 178-187.
[36] Meijer, A., Bolivar, & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2018). From E-government to digital era governance and beyond: Lessons from 15 years of research into information and communication technology in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Online First.
[37] Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational researcher, 18(2), 5-11.
[38] Miah, S. J. (2013). An e-Government approach for bridging the participation gap in achieving participatory good governance. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 9(2), 85-100.
[39] Moon, B. (1995). Paradigms in migration research: exploring'moorings' as a schema. Progress in human geography, 19(4), 504-524.
[40] Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research, 2(3), 192-222.
[41] Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological bulletin, 105(3), 430.
[42] Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non‐normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(2), 171-189.
[43] Nasseef, O. A., Baabdullah, A. M., Alalwan, A. A., Lal, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based public healthcare systems: G2G knowledge-based exchange to enhance the decision-making process. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101618.
[44] Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.
[45] Nyazabe, S. N., Hwang, G. H., & Manyole, O. B. (2023). Influential Factors in the Implementation of an Educational Blockchain System in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: Case of Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Educational Reform, 10567879231217481.
[46] Panza, J. (2019). L'histoire du numérique en République Démocratique du Congo.
[47] Pathak, R. D., Naz, R., Rahman, M. H., Smith, R. F. I., & Nayan Agarwal, K. (2009). E-governance to cut corruption in public service delivery: A case study of Fiji. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 32(5), 415-437.
[48] Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European journal of information systems, 17, 236-263.
[49] Psailla, G., & Wagner, R. (Eds.). (2007). E-Commerce and Web Technologies: 8th International Conference, EC-Web 2007, Regensburg, Germany, September 3-7, 2007, Proceedings (Vol. 4655). Springer.
[50] Pype, K. (2021). (Not) in sync–digital time and forms of (dis-) connecting: ethnographic notes from Kinshasa (DR Congo). Media, Culture & Society, 43(7), 1197-1212.
[51] Rao, V. R. (2011). Collaborative government to employee (G2E): Issues and challenges to e-government. Journal of e-Governance, 34(4), 214-229.
[52] Rondinelli, D. A. (2006). Public administration and democratic governance: Governments serving citizens. © United Nations, All rights reserved.
[53] Santa, R., MacDonald, J. B., & Ferrer, M. (2019). The role of trust in e-Government effectiveness, operational effectiveness and user satisfaction: Lessons from Saudi Arabia in e-G2B. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 39-50.
[54] Srivastava, A., & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research.
[55] Straub, D., Boudreau, M. C., & Gefen, D. (2004). Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information systems, 13(1), 24.
[56] Subhajit, B. (2004). E-government and developing countries: an overview. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(1), 109-132.
[57] Tennakoon, W. D. N. S. M. (2020). E-governance way forward: challenges and opportunities for developing countries. Evidences from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 21(2), 51-61.
[58] Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: End user adoption in MIS. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 114-121.
[59] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
[60] Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178.
[61] Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government information quarterly, 25(4), 717-733.
[62] Wirtz, B. W., & Piehler, R. (2016). eGovernment Applications and public personnel acceptance: an empirical analysis of the public servant perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(3), 238-247.
[63] World Bank Group. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. World Bank Publications.
[64] Yi, M. Y., Jeong, S., & Lai, F. (2006). The role of facilitating condition in knowledge management system success: A meta-analysis. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 17(1), 80-94.
[65] Zhao, F., & Khan, M. S. (2013). An empirical study of e-government service adoption: culture and behavioral intention. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(10), 710-722.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mobonda, R. B., Nyazabe, S. N., Myung-Jin, L., Mofunda, V. K., Mbembo, J. L. (2024). Navigating Uncertain Terrain: Unveiling the Factors Influencing E-Governance Adoption in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems, 9(3), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajomis.20240903.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mobonda, R. B.; Nyazabe, S. N.; Myung-Jin, L.; Mofunda, V. K.; Mbembo, J. L. Navigating Uncertain Terrain: Unveiling the Factors Influencing E-Governance Adoption in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Am. J. Oper. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2024, 9(3), 43-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajomis.20240903.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mobonda RB, Nyazabe SN, Myung-Jin L, Mofunda VK, Mbembo JL. Navigating Uncertain Terrain: Unveiling the Factors Influencing E-Governance Adoption in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Am J Oper Manag Inf Syst. 2024;9(3):43-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajomis.20240903.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajomis.20240903.11,
      author = {Raphael Boboto Mobonda and Sllife Nyazabe Nyazabe and Lee Myung-Jin and Vogel Kiketa Mofunda and Justin Lingole Mbembo},
      title = {Navigating Uncertain Terrain: Unveiling the Factors Influencing E-Governance Adoption in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    },
      journal = {American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {43-55},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajomis.20240903.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajomis.20240903.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajomis.20240903.11},
      abstract = {This research provides a comprehensive examination of the factors influencing e-governance adoption in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It leverages a combined framework integrating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. This approach, integrating specific variables like trust, which encompasses information security, is particularly relevant in the context of the Democratic Republic of the Congo's unique socio-political environment, where digital governance offers significant potential for improving public services and fostering transparency. The research employs a robust methodology, including a survey of 154 respondents and the use of Covariance-based Structured Equation Model analysis to identify the key factors influencing e-governance adoption. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners working on e-governance initiatives, not only in the DR Congo but also in developing countries facing similar challenges. Results show that users value e-governance systems that are easy to navigate and use. The access to accurate and relevant information is essential for effective e-governance adoption. Furthermore, facilitating conditions such as access to resources, knowledge, and compatible technology are crucial for enabling citizen engagement. Additionally, social influence, including social norms and perceived image, impacts users' attitudes and intentions towards e-governance adoption. Building trust in government is critical for encouraging citizen participation and adoption of e-governance services. 
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Navigating Uncertain Terrain: Unveiling the Factors Influencing E-Governance Adoption in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    
    AU  - Raphael Boboto Mobonda
    AU  - Sllife Nyazabe Nyazabe
    AU  - Lee Myung-Jin
    AU  - Vogel Kiketa Mofunda
    AU  - Justin Lingole Mbembo
    Y1  - 2024/09/26
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajomis.20240903.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajomis.20240903.11
    T2  - American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems
    JF  - American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems
    JO  - American Journal of Operations Management and Information Systems
    SP  - 43
    EP  - 55
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-8310
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajomis.20240903.11
    AB  - This research provides a comprehensive examination of the factors influencing e-governance adoption in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It leverages a combined framework integrating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model. This approach, integrating specific variables like trust, which encompasses information security, is particularly relevant in the context of the Democratic Republic of the Congo's unique socio-political environment, where digital governance offers significant potential for improving public services and fostering transparency. The research employs a robust methodology, including a survey of 154 respondents and the use of Covariance-based Structured Equation Model analysis to identify the key factors influencing e-governance adoption. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners working on e-governance initiatives, not only in the DR Congo but also in developing countries facing similar challenges. Results show that users value e-governance systems that are easy to navigate and use. The access to accurate and relevant information is essential for effective e-governance adoption. Furthermore, facilitating conditions such as access to resources, knowledge, and compatible technology are crucial for enabling citizen engagement. Additionally, social influence, including social norms and perceived image, impacts users' attitudes and intentions towards e-governance adoption. Building trust in government is critical for encouraging citizen participation and adoption of e-governance services. 
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ministry of Posts, Telecommunications, and Digital, General Secretariat for Digital Affairs, Kinshasa, DR Congo

  • Grduate School of Global Digital Innovation, College of Business, Daejeon, South Korea; Computing Management and English for Business, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, DR Congo

  • Digital Technology Transformation, Soongsil University, Dongjak-gu, Korea

  • School of Engineering, Technology Management, Economy and Policy, Seoul of National University, Seoul, South Korea; Computing Management and English for Business, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, DR Congo

  • Digital Innovation, Hanyang University Erica, Ansan, Korea; Computing Management and English for Business, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, DR Congo

  • Sections